Vic
Nair: "Golf course
development is now emerging as a major environmental issue in Asia"
The ECOCLUB Interview with
Dr Vikneswaran Nair
President, Asia-Pacific
Council on Hotel, Restaurant & Institutional Education
(APacCHRIE)
Index of
Interviews
A
graduate of University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Dr. Vikneswaran (Vic) Nair
completed his Ph.D. in Systems Engineering with his research on
developing an expert system for ecotourism accreditation and rating for
Peninsular Malaysia. At present, he heads the Centre for Research and
Development at Taylor’s University College Malaysia and a Senior
Lecturer at the Taylor’s School of Hospitality and Tourism. Dr. Vic
Nair has more than 12 years experience in the field of application of
Information & Communication Technology in Hospitality &
Tourism, Sustainable Tourism, Ecotourism Management and Environmental
Management. He is also an adjunct lecturer for many public universities
in Malaysia, and also has conducted guest lectures on responsible
tourism and ecotourism management for the graduate programme at the
University of Toulouse, France, Rikkyo University, Japan and Institute
for Tourism Studies (IFT), Macau.
A seasoned researcher and consultant with more than 100 publications to
his credit, he was accorded the Merit Award for Academic Leadership and
Accomplishment as the Outstanding Young Malaysian of the Year organised
by Junior Chambers International, for his contribution to the
ecotourism industry of Malaysia in 2006 and other awards including
Taylor’s Chairman’s Staff Excellence Award for Academic Excellence
(2002) & Research Excellence (2007) and Best Paper Award for
Tourism Research in the Malaysia's Third National Tourism Educators
Conference (2004).
ABOUT
TAYLOR'S UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MALAYSIA
Since its establishment in 1969, Taylor's University College Malaysia
(Web:
http://www.taylors.edu.my)
has
expanded from its main location in Subang Jaya, to include four
additional campuses extending throughout the area surrounding its main
campus including Taylor's College School of Hospitality and Tourism
(TCHT). With over twenty years of experience, TCHT today is one of South East
Asia’s largest and most established hospitality and tourism management
colleges providing quality
education and training to thousands of students. In 2007, TCHT clinched
the prestigious Hospitality Asia Platinum Awards (HAPA) for Hospitality
School of the Year 2007-2008 (Malaysia Series). The school offers
industry-acclaimed diplomas, higher diplomas, degrees and professional
Master Degree from the Academie de Toulouse and University of Toulouse
in France.
(The
Interview follows:)
ECOCLUB.com:
How
did you end up discovering and specialising in Ecotourism as an
Academic, and how has your understanding evolved over the recent years?
Vic Nair: It is by accident that I
ventured into the world of ecotourism. I have always had the passion
for ecology and environment even when I was young. I have always
enjoyed roughing out in the nature, doing jungle trekking, camping at
the beachfront and other nature based tourism activities. Upon
completing my Bachelor Degree in Horticulture, I spend 2 years in the
plantations in Batang Berjuntai. In 1996, I was offered by University
Putra Malaysia to carry out a research to design an expert system to
manage the terrestrial vegetation impact in carrying out the
Environmental Impact Assessment.
Upon graduation in 1998, I was offered a job in Taylor’s School of
Hospitality and Tourism. Thus, Taylor’s College was indeed my eye
opener to the magnificent world of Tourism. Thus, I continued my PhD
thereafter in developing another expert system for rating the
ecotourism industry of Malaysia. With my strong ecological background,
I had little trouble to complete my PhD in 2003. Hence, I was involved
in many researches and consultancy work in the field of tourism and
have published many articles and papers in many forums nationally and
internationally. Subsequently my interest and understanding evolved
from nature tourism to sustainable tourism to responsible tourism.
ECOCLUB.com:
You
have also extensively studied Ecotourism Certification &
Rating. What is your overall evaluation of its usefulness and
implementability in Malaysia, compared to other countries in the
Asia-Pacific region?
Vic Nair: There are approximately about
500 potential or existing ecotourism sites in Malaysia as reported by
WWF in their report for the National Ecotourism Plan in 1996. In
addition, there are many agencies managing ecotourism in Malaysia which
make the coordination and standardisation of all the code of practices
a challenge.
At national level, the main government bodies relevant to ecotourism
are the Ministry of Tourism, Tourism Malaysia (Malaysia’s tourism
promotion arm), Ministry of Agriculture, including the Department of
Fisheries (for Marine Parks), Department of Agriculture (for agro
tourism which is related to ecotourism) and Department of Irrigation
and Drainage (for river management). Within Peninsular Malaysia, other
very important government bodies over seeing ecotourism resources and
service provisions are the Department of Wildlife and National Parks
(for national parks, wildlife reserves and sanctuaries and protection
of wildlife), the Forestry Department with the constituent state
forestry departments (for recreational forest), the State Governments
(eco-sites within the boundaries of a state), the Economic Planning
Unit and State Economic Planning Units, other departments and agencies
such as the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, Veterinary Services
Department, Forest Research Institute of Malaysia, the Malaysian
Fisheries Development Board and universities.
Thus, with some many National Tourism Organisations (NTO) involved in
managing ecotourism, a standardised certification and rating become
more and more important in Malaysia compared to other Asia Pacific
region where the NTO structure is not so complicated.
Therefore, it can be said that the main problems in the current
practice of ensuring sustainable development of the ecotourism industry
in Malaysia are: lack of
effective and proper approaches for efficient sustainable management
practice of the ecotourism site, lack of enforcement in ensuring the
ecosystem is sustained; insufficient environmental cum ecological
expertise that incorporates the fundamental of safety, health and
environment; lack of consistent approaches in implementing a mitigation
measures and in satisfying the requirement of national environmental
regulatory authorities; the large number of small organisations
involved in tourism and their related fields make the effort to collect
data from them both costly and time-consuming, resulting in unreliable
and incomplete ecotourism databases.
Hence, a reliable and consistent rating system and database system is
required to ensure the sustainability of these ecotourism sites, which
can be used for intelligent decision-making. A systematic rating system
is developed to maintain a certain level of standards.
IIn order to make ecotourism development sustainable with minimum
impact on the nature, it is important that all ecotourism sites are
evaluated and rated in terms of importance and attractiveness.
Nonetheless, with the complex bureaucracy and the organization of the
NTO in Malaysia, the implementability of this certification and rating
is dictated by the political party in power and the Minister who
manages his/her Ministry for a period of 4-5 years before being
replaced with another Minister who has his or her own vision during the
period of his/her term as a Minister.
Thus, the industry suffers. Since completion of my study in developing
an ecotourism rating system for Peninsular Malaysia in 2003, five years
later today, there is still no concerted effort done to check and
balance the fragile ecotourism industry in Malaysia. A comprehensive
National Ecotourism Plan that was prepared by WWF in consultation with
the ecotourism guru, Architect Hector Ceballos-Lascurain for the
Ministry of Tourism, Malaysia in 1996 was not utilized to the maximum
to effectively manage the ecotourism industry in Malaysia. Today, the
Ministry of Tourism is inviting potential consultants and academicians
to re-work on the National Ecotourism Plan. What will happen after this
report is completed is everybody’s guess.
ECOCLUB.com:
What are the main
challenges for Tourism and the Ecotourism movement in Malaysia
today, and how suitable and 'eco' are related current state and federal
government policies?
Vic
Nair: The
current Government policies, both the State and the Federal, need to
further holistically focus on the impact of over-development on
ecotourism destinations. 50 years ago Malaysia was a destination of
eco-paradise with beautiful and coral rich beaches and one of the
world's oldest tropical rain forests. The diversity of its flora and
fauna is a result of undisturbed evolution over 130 million years.
Malaysia has plenty of
natural attractions to satisfy even the most discerning of adventure
seekers. With the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean lapping its
shores, there is an enormous variety of flora, fauna and marine life to
be enjoyed. Ecotourism has become a major enterprise in Malaysia in the
last decade. Several pristine rain forest areas have now, been turned
into national parks and recreational parks. Total Protected Areas in
the Peninsular Malaysia has dwindled with the major areas still in the
Borneo Island of the Eastern Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak). Sadly, now
even this part of Malaysia is projected for development under the
Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE) and Sabah Development
Corridor (SDC) which was announce by the Prime Minister of Malaysia
early this year. It is everybody’s hope that the development in this
eco-paradise destinations will be done carefully and not solely for
commercial purpose.
In a market driven
environment, what the ecotourism industry in Malaysia needs and the
public must demand is a ruler for measuring the impact of tourism on
natural resources. Ensuring that nature-based tourism and ecotourism
establishes and maintains high standards will be a challenge for all
parties. The management of sensitive ecosystem in the ecotourism
context can one way protect a country’s heritage and make it available
for local education and tourism. The investment in such facilities is
usually repaid through tourists who come in larger numbers and stay
longer because there are more things to see and do and at the same time
be contended that the sustainability of the site has been looked into.
The environment is the resource base for tourism; without protection,
the natural attraction that brought the tourist in the first place will
be lost.
ECOCLUB.com:
Observing Malaysia
today, it is hard to see any signs that over a generation ago, there
was major intercultural / intercommunal friction. Has Tourism played
any part in terms of better understanding &
integration between Malaysian communities, and what about
indigenous people?
Vic Nair: Tourism may have played their part in
bridging the understanding of the multiculture, which is the selling
point of Malaysia. The “Malaysia Truly Asia”, tagline that was adopted
by the country for the last so many years, indeed portray the unique
culture and the harmonious living among the three distinct people of
Asia, the Malays (Muslims), the Chinese and the Indians. These three
populations put together, the Malays (comprising Malaysia, Indonesia
and Brunei), the Indians (Malaysia, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and
Pakistan) and Chinese (Malaysia. China and almost all of North and East
Asia), will make up almost 75 percent of the world population. Thus,
Malaysia is indeed a melting port or sample of what Asia has to offer.
Thus, tourism in Malaysia has certainly capitalized on this unique
advantage in terms of better understanding and integration.
In a multiracial country like Malaysia, certainly there are bound to be
some intercultural and inter communal friction but it is within the
control and tolerance of the country.
Similarly, tourism has
certainly opened the doors for the indigenous people especially in
Sabah and Sarawak. Nonetheless, the benefits that tourism brings in
alleviating poverty among these indigenous communities are still
questionable. Many of them continue to live in their natural
environment which is getting scarce day by day with deforestation for
development, plantation expansion, etc. The Sarawak Corridor
of Renewable Energy (SCORE) and Sabah Development Corridor (SDC) will
further displace these communities if the development is not done with
these communities in mind.
ECOCLUB.com:
Among other
things, you have working experience of
oil palm & rubber estates, which have been blamed for
deforestation in many other parts of the world. So, do you
see Ecotourism as a realistic alternative to plantations
and forestry in Malaysia, or merely as an add-on?
Vic
Nair:
I do not
see Ecotourism as a realistic alternative
to plantations and forestry in Malaysia. Malaysia is one of the largest
producers of natural rubber and palm oil in the world. Despite having
been industry for so many years, Malaysia still face the problem of
poor management practice in land clearing. Although, incidence of slash
burning is under control in Malaysia in comparison to Indonesia,
problem of haze still persist.
Although the total size
of rubber plantations in Malaysia has dwindled
over the last decade, oil palm, which is the backbone of the plantation
industry today in Malaysia, has expanded its cultivation from 54,000
hectares in 1960 to 4.17 million hectares as at May 2007. Hence, this
represents nearly a 70-fold increase in size in the last four and a
half decades. Palm oil cultivation occupies 66% out of the 6.3 million
hectares of total agricultural land.
Deforestation for oil
palms and rubber estates is a problem in Eastern
Malaysia (Sabah & Sarawak). With oil palm and rubber still
fetching good price at the market, ecotourism will never be a good
alternative to plantations and forestry in Malaysia. Instead, the
plantation industry in Malaysia must ensure the practice of sound
environmental measures by ensuring zero burning, good agricultural
practices and the use of biological agents to reduce pests and
effluents.
On the other hand, in
Peninsular Malaysia the damage done to ecosystem
in irrevocable. One just needs to look at the birds eye view as your
plane glide down to the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA).
Massive land clearing, erosion and destruction of the flora and fauna,
is evident. Nevertheless, there seem to be some commitment off late
from Malaysia’s palm oil industry. Approximately US$7 million wildlife
conservation fund was recently launched. The revolving fund would for
start help fund a survey on Sabah’s orang utan population that is
disappearing fast due to deforestation. Indeed the fund is one the many
examples of corporate social responsibility and environmental care by
the palm oil industry.
Today, palm oil
cultivation in Malaysia is strictly regulated and only
land designated for agricultural purposes are utilized. In addition,
research has also indicated that in a number of oil palm plantations in
Sabah, greater biodiversity in plantations attracts animals and birds.
Thus, there are some form of add-on that ecotourism can bring to these
plantations.
ECOCLUB.com:
You
were also once involved with sales and marketing of fertilisers and
agrochemicals for golf courses. Are the growing golf & luxury
tourism developments in Malaysia compatible with Ecotourism in your
view? Are golf developers really sincere about greening their act, or
is it a ruse to expand in sensitive ecosystems?
Vic
Nair:
As a
Horticulturist (my first degree), I was
introduced to the world of landscaping and golf course design in the
early 1990s. Quite often we hear about the Environmentally Friendly
Golf Course, Environmentally Sensitive Gold Course Design, etc. There
are also many golf courses that claim the following:
“This 36-hole golf
course was formed on 750 acres of land of which 147
acres were wetlands that formed a part of the fragile ecosystem…
incorporated these areas into the course architecture in order to
protect the wetlands and the unique wildlife habitat.”
Golf course development
is now emerging as a major environmental issue
in Asia. The problem may not seem so acute in Malaysia. Nonetheless,
because of the maintenance of large, closely trimmed grassy areas is
more difficult and environmentally hazardous in tropical areas which
are home to greater numbers of pests, diseases and weeds, the problem
of environmental damage is there.
In a small drought prone
destination like Langkawi, one of the major
tourist destination in Malaysia, there are water demand for about 2
million tourists and 4 golf courses. With a population of about 820,000
people, the fishing villagers and farmers of Langkawi are in the mercy
of golf developers who are not sincere in greening their act or even
creating employment to the local communities. They are more interested
to expand in sensitive ecosystems.
As a result, after
losing their farms, many of these villagers end up
as cheap labourers on their very own lands. Working on these golf
courses represents a drastic change from their once independent and
self-reliant way of life. All too often, this kind of change leads to
the collapse of whole rural communities. Those who are not employed by
golf courses move to big cities, contributing to the urban problems of
slums, traffic congestion and pollution.
Thus, golf course should
not venture into eco-sensitive sites and do
more damage then the short term commercial benefit to a few.
ECOCLUB.com:
In
your College, from your students, as well as from
your contacts with Tourism Academics around the world as Head
of CHRIE in Asia-Pacific, do you observe a falling, steady, or
increased interest in Ecotourism and environmental issues? And how
satisfied are you with the level of research in Ecotourism?
Vic
Nair:
Across
Asia-Pacific, there is certainly an increase
interest in Ecotourism and Environmental issues. With the Global
Warming phenomena that seem to be the main agenda in many forums across
the world including Malaysia, environmental interest has steadily
increased in the region. Nonetheless, there seem to be spin off to
ecotourism in the region at present with many countries moving into the
concept of “Responsible Tourism”.
According to Wild Asia,
a non-government organization based in Kuala
Lumpur who have been advocating this concept, there is a new wave of
tourists who are saying “no” to mass tourism, irresponsible operators
and resorts that are destroying the local environment. These
tourists want real quality experience. They want to know that the
shower they are taking is not depriving a village of water. That the
hotel they are staying at is not robbing the locals of their
livelihood. Or that their very presence is not offending the local
communities. Travel is about relaxation, rejuvenation, adventure,
fulfilment, playfulness and sharing experiences rather than just
'places and things' It certainly is not about being
cooped up in a tourist compound! This is what “Responsible Tourism” or
“RT” is all about.
RT in essence provides
quality travel experience that promotes
conservation of natural environment and offer opportunities and
benefits for local communities. RT in ideal is tourism operations that
are managed in such a way that they preserve the local environment and
culture so that it can continue to deliver the benefits for years to
come.
Thus, more applied and
fundamental research is required to study the
implementability of good practices of ecotourism or responsible
tourism. Currently, most research in this region seems to stay as a
research with no practical use or benefit. Institutions like Taylor’s
College and even CHRIE, can play a distinctive role in molding the
future graduates that are going to dictate the industry, with qualities
that are essential to the survival of mankind in this globalised age.
ECOCLUB.com:
You
are attending all sorts of Tourism-related conferences all over the
world, ranging from purely academic to business ones. How useful are
they really, beyond networking, in advancing theory, policy &
practice? And are Academics adequately listened to?
Vic
Nair:
Attending
conferences and seminars all over the
world is an important aspect of all academicians. Besides networking,
it is really a one-stop point for researchers to exchange notes and
argue on their findings which eventually will be picked up by policy
makers, entrepreneurs, funding bodies, etc. Thus, academicians have to
be conscious to the happenings in the industry in order to develop both
the basic and applied research. Armed with this knowledge, academicians
are able to educate the youths of the world to take their productive
place as leaders in the global community.
Thus, a tenured
academician must be able to speak his/her thoughts
without being oppressed or judgmental of his/her critical thoughts.
Sadly, this is still lacking in many countries around the globe
including Malaysia, where academicians are bounded by the political
power house that dictates what should be said and not question their
constructive criticism.
ECOCLUB.com:
Are
Malaysian Tourism graduates easily absorbed into the 'job market'
compared to other disciplines or has there been saturation? What are
the hot topics within Tourism?
Vic
Nair:
The
Malaysian tourism graduates are easily absorbed
into the ‘job market’ especially those trained from reputable
hospitality and tourism universities like Taylor’s College, where
practical exposure, management and entrepreneurial skills are blended
to fit to the industry requirement.
Nonetheless, as more and
more highly qualified and skilled hospitality
and tourism staff force are pinched by the industry in Singapore, Macau
and Hong Kong, there is a serious turnover across the industry in
Malaysia. As a result, many front liners in the industry in Malaysia
are being managed by immigrants from Indonesia, India, Bangladesh,
China, etc.
Thus, there is an
imbalance of growth of the academia in relation to
what the industry can offer in Malaysia. The Ministry of Tourism in
Malaysia is aware of this gap and is current trying to tackle this
issue.
ECOCLUB.com:
Finally,
which is your favourite ecological / responsible tourism spot
or operation in Malaysia, and why?
Vic
Nair:
Personally,
I enjoyed Mulu National Park in Sarawak.
Mulu National Park is the largest park in Sarawak, with an area of 544
square kilometres. The Mulu National Park has been designated a World
Heritage Site by UNESCO in November 2000 for its natural beauty and the
world's largest cave system with its amazingly rich bio-diversity.
Out of the 27 caves
discovered in Mulu, so far, only four caves are
open to the general public, with some others being accessible to groups
of experienced adventure cavers. Fortunately, the four "show caves" are
a representative sample of the whole cave system, each cave being
completely different from the others. The caves – Lang Cave, Clearwater
Cave, Deer Cave and Wind Cave – which are easily accessible, are
surrounded by natural settings that contain different and beautiful
scenic spots that make a visit fulfilling to any tourist.
Mulu has successfully
balanced the social inherence (respect host
culture, conserve built and living cultural heritage & promote
inter-cultural understanding and tolerance), environment optimisation
(optimal use of resources, maintain ecological processes & help
conserve natural heritage) and also the economical benefits and
opportunities (profits, long-term business viability, provide
socio-econ benefits to all stakeholders, support stable employment
opportunities and social services & contribution to poverty
alleviation), which is critical for a successful ecotourism destination.
ECOCLUB.com:
Any
other thoughts?
Vic Nair: As
ecotourism becomes increasingly popular, a need has emerged for both
industry standards and procedures, and for monitoring compliance with
such requirements. Such standards and monitoring procedures can
distinguish valid ecotourism projects from other enterprises that have
appropriated the ecotourism label without commitment to its principles.
Such measurements are also necessary to help honest ecotourism projects
critique their performance and move closer to the ideal of
sustainability.
Today, a need has
emerged for both standards and procedures to monitor
compliance with these standards. Client evaluation is a simple
procedure available to all ecotourism operations that can serve to both
enhance tourist education and provide a simple system of monitoring. As
an educational tool it can be used to focus the tourists' attention
upon ecotourism criteria. As a monitoring system it has an advantage
over either surveys or on-site investigation because it provides
information by observers supplied over an extended period of time.
The management of
sensitive ecosystem in the ecotourism context can one
way protect a country’s heritage and make it available for local
education and tourism. The investment in such facilities is usually
repaid through tourists who come in larger numbers and stay longer
because there are more things to see and do and at the same time be
contended that the sustainability of the site has been looked into.
Further, the ecotourist
needs to understand the value of participating
in this evaluation programme. This requires them being told
how the findings will be used and how they will benefit, as well as the
environment and local culture, from nature tour operators adhering to
management standards and guidelines. One way to accomplish
this goal is through an incentive program that encourages nature tour
operators, guides, and lodging establishments to participate in the
evaluation process.
In
conclusion, as the ecotourism industry continues to grow, greater
pressure will be placed on nature tour operators, lodging
establishments, trade associations and governmental bodies to ensure a
high quality tourism experience for its customers, to protect the
natural and cultural resources that are utilized, and remain
economically sustainable. To accomplish this goal, the
ecotourism industry in countries, regions and destination areas are
going to have to make tough decisions regarding how they hope to ensure
the future of the industry. An underlying tension will always
exists among the different ecotourism providers on how to best achieve
this goal. The tension is between self-regulation by a
business, the collective development and enforcement of objectives and
guidelines by an ecotourism association, or through regulation by a
governmental entity.
ECOCLUB.com:
Thank you very much!
Find the
complete list of ECOCLUB Interviews here
Disclaimer:
Any views expressed in this magazine belong to their respective authors
and are not necessarily those of ECOCLUB S.A. Although we try to check
all facts, we accept no liability for inaccuracies - which means you
should not take any travel or other decisions based only on what you
read here... Use of this magazine is covered by the Terms &
Conditions of the ECOCLUB.com Website and by your uncommon
sense and good humour. |