"Hotels for Trees" is essentially a carbon off-setter that undertakes, on behalf of the hotelier to "plant a tree each time a guest chooses to skip daily cleaning". As environmental savings are already - supposedly - made by the skipping of daily cleaning, wouldn't it make more sense for the off-setter, and for all of us, to undertake to pay the equivalent money to the hotel cleaner whose..."Hotels for Trees" is essentially a carbon off-setter that undertakes, on behalf of the hotelier to "plant a tree each time a guest chooses to skip daily cleaning". As environmental savings are already - supposedly - made by the skipping of daily cleaning, wouldn't it make more sense for the off-setter, and for all of us, to undertake to pay the equivalent money to the hotel cleaner whose services are not needed on that day? Reforestation is fine, but why link it to loss of pay/employment - For every laid off hotel worker, we plant 10 trees? Show more