|
|
EDITORIAL:
Peace Through Tourism (not through War)
In the last decade, already a century ago in more ways than one, most would
joke when beauty queens would invariably end their acceptance speech
laundry list with "and world peace". I am not sure how many
dare laugh
about world peace these days (or if beauty queens are still at it). In the
aftermath of the tsunami disaster which showed once more how small,
globalised and interdependent the world really is, also thanks to tourism, and
what global cooperation can achieve compared to global domination, in
this issue we hear from Louis D'Amore, founder of the International
Institute of Peace through Tourism, to learn why and how tourism
facilitates peace and reasonable discourse on the international scene. It seems
that the obvious must be stated these days, as the Orwellian mantras about
new world orders, bringing peace through war and force-feeding freedom, which are
resounding in the corridors of power, should not also dominate the
media or the minds.
In an increasingly complex and sometimes surreal world, some
leaders would like us believe they know what's best for us, as they have been
blessed with special abilities to distinguish right from wrong,
ethical from unethical, democratic from tyrannic. I am still
not clear if these people are first-rate actors (although even b-rate actors have been successful
politicians) or if, by the time they have sampled power (sweet power) they have
already come to believe themselves. Not to mention that in an unfortunate way, all
leaders, elected or unelected, are by definition tyrants for a certain
period of time. Contrary to popular belief, many elected tyrants tend to survive longer than
unelected ones.
Then again,
what is the alternative? Most leaders have been groomed from early age to decide for
the rest of us, while joining them are a few others who have been accepted to
the top echelons, simply by doing away with any scruples, or
affinities, assumed that they ever had any. But can all of us
really and practically decide for all of us? Was there ever a direct
democracy, beyond "primitive" tribal society, or say beyond
idealised, classical Athens? And look what happened to
"primitive" societies, or classical Athens, they were
powerless in front of the advancing, (freedom / civilisation
spreading?) war machines of Sparta, Alexander, the Romans and later imperial
powers, which would be so un pc to mention by name.
And what
about our own medium, one may say, the Internet. Is the
Internet a glimmering hope for direct, leaderless, devolved, peer to
peer, true democracy? A
case of instant e-government miraculously combining anonymity and participation? Or is that gratification that of a dream (aka virtual), an illusion?
And indeed an
increasingly monitored and controlled dream? Pessimists would
argue that it has already evolved into a mass monitoring device with the consent of
uninformed and untrained users, who miss the forest (of control) for the tree (tree
= hackers, bugs, worms, trojans and other nuisances).
Who knows? It
is perhaps "too early to say" as Chou En Lai, famously replied
when asked "What do you think the outcome of the French
revolution was?". Progress is
slow, and sometimes negative. Nevertheless, humans are still on this planet, still (hopefully)
evolving (evolution sadly still being a taboo subject even where
it was not), if only by cosmic accident, rather than our leader's efforts or
any divine
providence.
As Henry Miller,
the much censored and badmouthed, wrote, "the world
is not to be put in order, the world is order incarnate. It is for us
to put ourselves in unison with this order". I bet, if he were
still around today, he would have been very inspired, and very
badmouthed.
Antonis
B. Petropoulos
ECOCLUB Editor
|